Rationale for Antimicrobial Combinations
Why Combine Antimicrobials · The Four Objectives (Synergy · Prevent Resistance · Broaden Spectrum · Dose-Sparing) · Mechanisms of Synergy (Sequential Blockade, Cell-Wall–Uptake, β-Lactamase Protection) · Cidal/Static Interaction Grid · Indications (Enterococcal SABE, Pseudomonas, TB/Leprosy/HIV, H. pylori, Mixed Infection, Empirical Sepsis) · Disadvantages, Antagonism & Superinfection · In-vitro Testing (Checkerboard, Time-Kill)
Past MPMSU · 1
MPMSUMay '19
Introduction & the monotherapy default
- Antimicrobial combination therapy — the concurrent use of more than one antimicrobial agent (AMA) for a single infectious indication — justified only with a specific purpose, never blindly in the hope that "if one is good, two should be better."
- Monotherapy is the rule — for definitive therapy, combination is the exception; once a pathogen is isolated a single agent is preferred unless compelling data favour a combination. Severity of infection is not in itself an indication to combine, and combinations are no substitute for an accurate diagnosis.
- Cost of needless combining — using multiple drugs where one would suffice increases toxicity and inflicts unnecessary damage on the protective bacterial/fungal flora; combinations are therefore reserved for defined "special circumstances."
- Scope — this answer concerns the rationale, mechanisms of synergy, resistance-prevention, disadvantages and in-vitro testing of antimicrobial combinations — not fixed-dose combinations generically, nor the molecular mechanisms of resistance per se.
Continue reading
Antimicrobial Combination Rationale
PharmaNotes Pro · LAQ
Sign in with your Google account. If you're already subscribed, the chapter unlocks immediately — otherwise, pick Monthly or Annual on the next step.